|
|
|
THE question must be asked, what purpose is served by compiling lists of famous men who also happen to have been freemasons?
Is it to demonstrate Freemasonrys beneficial and inspiring effect on men who have gone on to make a positive impact on their world, or is it a need on the part of contemporary freemasons to "ride on the coat-tails" of others?
Without a careful review of lodge records, there is no way of knowing if these men ever attended a meeting after their initiation, much less if the teachings of Freemasonry played any role in their lives. Harry S Truman left a record of active masonic service, while the Duke of Wellington in his later years could not even remember having joined.
There have been those, such as Léo Taxil and Éliphas Lévi, who were initiated and then expelled. They are, in some fashion, famous, and at one time they were, in some fashion, freemasons. A definitive list should therefore include their names, although few freemasons would wish to draw attention to them.
And then there are those such as Henry Ford who made a profound impact on our world but whose personal beliefs may not have reflected the best of human nature. Honesty dictates that we record their names, celebrate their contributions and recognize their failings.
A list of famous freemasons is not a list of perfect men but simply of men who have tried to make this a better world. The purpose for such a list should be the remembrance of those members of the Craft who in some fashion embodied the ideals of Freemasonry. That is the purpose of this list.
|
|
|
|
|